> "Deprecate" means that the feature still works but using it shows a > deprecation warning in the DevTools console and kicks Reporting API. > > IMO, we should

> approval to remove.) >> > > Will do. And yeah I didn't think I needed LGTMs to deprecate, only to > remove, right? Akin to I2P not needing LGTM, but I2S needing

from M128 to M130. On Friday, February 28, 2025 at 8:05:49 PM UTC Mike Taylor wrote: > Just for the history books: how long was CHIPS disabled in WebView? 127 to > 130? > On 2/26

WebView team to proceed and will be > doing a gradual Finch rollout of the removal starting M133. Progress > will be tracked on this issue . > > Best, > Ayu > > On Monday

the "Intent to Deprecate" template from https://www.chromium.org/blink/launching-features/ without realizing it was not for "Intent to Deprecate and Remove

nobody seems to be calling them, it should be fine and 2 milestones should be enough to find deprecation warnings. LGTM3 On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 12:16 PM Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM2 >

re going to clean up as soon as possible. Please disregard most sections of the email, the relevant bit is here: Reason this experiment is being extended We request to extend the origin

amend that to LGTM2 % filling out and request the Enterprise, > Debuggability, and Testing chips in chromestatus > > On 11/8/24 11:55 AM, Mike Taylor wrote: >> >

'll deprecate the method with `DeprecateAs` in the IDL file > 2. Then we'll add a blink runtime feature off by default that > hides the method with `RuntimeEnabled` to

>> and Testing in the chromestatus entry? Thanks! >>> >> On 8/26/24 12:40 PM, Mike Taylor wrote: >>> >> LGTM1 to remove - if there's no usage

Good to know. Thanks folks. On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 12:04 PM Mike Taylor wrote: > +1 - no approvals needed. :) > On 8/9/24 1:20 AM, Domenic Denicola wrote: > > If this method was

idea is to add `position-area` in M129, and deprecate (but not yet >>> remove) `inset-area` also in M129. And then ideally remove `inset-area` in >>> M131. Two

complete, to avoid related noise. On Wednesday, April 3, 2024 at 12:52:23 PM UTC+1 Noam Rosenthal wrote: > On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 3:12 PM Aaron Leventhal > wrote: > >>

We propose to block access to IP address 0.0.0.0 in advance of PNA >> completely rolling out. Chrome is deprecating direct access to private >> network endpoints from

too hard to catch the cause for the behavior change in the few sites that will be affected. Sounds good, I will keep the existing console message in there, at least for a while. On Wed, May

been an intent to deprecate and > remove for this feature. However, that one failed to make it to the right > dashboards due to the subject line being incorrect. See that prior >

(resending to list) > > LGTM2 to go directly to removal (with a flag of course). Also, keep an eye > on enterprise feedback since they are a blind area. > > I took a look at

permissions (and specifically >>> referenced third_party/blink/renderer/modules/permissions/permission_descriptor.idl); >>> Looks like fingerprinting

m glad to hear that's the feedback you get. In addition to actually minimizing harm, it's also an important goal of our process to earn and retain the trust of web businesses

as value and could not find it, I guess it is >>> not standardized yet. >>> >>> >> The `as` values are defined as a Fetch destination >> . For

you intend to deprecate and remove, that is the "Prepare to ship" stage on your chromestatus feature entry. You can use the review gate chips to access the intent preview

by Mike and Philip. > > /Daniel > On 2023-12-14 10:18, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 6:10 PM Shu-yu Guo wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at

all, to follow up here, we're happy to share that the first-party Deprecation Trial (DT for top-level sites) for 3PCD is now available. See below resources for more details: Announcement

related enhancements and improvements. Given the critical role of SQLite in Chrome's infrastructure, I would like to draw your attention to some security benefits associated

in ability to tamper User-Agent, that... umm, ecosystem improvement helps dishonest app developers to make use of any web content they had no right to use. I'm aware that the value

are subscribed to the Google > Groups "blink-dev" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to blink-dev+unsubscribe

> SummaryThis intent is for implementing the changes in Blink that are > necessary to perform a controlled rollout and testing of the planned > upcoming third-party cookie

Most seem to have been caused by an extremely outdated OpenSSL (several even still vulnerable to Heartbleed!) and were resolved by the servers updating their OpenSSL. I've put

> LGTM1 to ship. Risk seems very low (and worth it, given security >> improvements), but thanks for adding a runtime enabled feature. >> On 9/7/23 12:44 AM, 'Jun

status page to reflect the removal. On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 12:54 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM3 > On 5/24/23 11:05 AM, Mike West wrote: > > LGTM2. > > -mike > > >